]> www.pilppa.org Git - linux-2.6-omap-h63xx.git/commitdiff
mac80211: small rate control changes
authorJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:03:28 +0000 (02:03 +0200)
committerJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:48:23 +0000 (16:48 -0400)
This patch fixes mac80211 to not rely on the rate control
algorithm to update sta->tx_retry_failed and sta->tx_retry_count
(even if we don't currently use them), removes a number of
completely unused values we don't even show in debugfs and
changes the code in ieee80211_tx_status() to not look up the
sta_info repeatedly.

The only behaviour change here would be not calling the rate
control function rate_control_tx_status() when no sta_info is
found, but all rate control algorithms ignore such calls anyway.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
net/mac80211/main.c
net/mac80211/rc80211_pid_algo.c
net/mac80211/sta_info.h

index dd838b725afbd3c54e565cc33b0acd047b5987da..c307dba7ec034ce215975c26af7b86012dfd82be 100644 (file)
@@ -546,29 +546,27 @@ void ieee80211_tx_status(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct sk_buff *skb)
 
        rcu_read_lock();
 
-       if (info->status.excessive_retries) {
-               sta = sta_info_get(local, hdr->addr1);
-               if (sta) {
-                       if (test_sta_flags(sta, WLAN_STA_PS)) {
-                               /*
-                                * The STA is in power save mode, so assume
-                                * that this TX packet failed because of that.
-                                */
-                               ieee80211_handle_filtered_frame(local, sta, skb);
-                               rcu_read_unlock();
-                               return;
-                       }
+       sta = sta_info_get(local, hdr->addr1);
+
+       if (sta) {
+               if (info->status.excessive_retries &&
+                   test_sta_flags(sta, WLAN_STA_PS)) {
+                       /*
+                        * The STA is in power save mode, so assume
+                        * that this TX packet failed because of that.
+                        */
+                       ieee80211_handle_filtered_frame(local, sta, skb);
+                       rcu_read_unlock();
+                       return;
                }
-       }
 
-       fc = hdr->frame_control;
+               fc = hdr->frame_control;
+
+               if ((info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU_NO_BACK) &&
+                   (ieee80211_is_data_qos(fc))) {
+                       u16 tid, ssn;
+                       u8 *qc;
 
-       if ((info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU_NO_BACK) &&
-           (ieee80211_is_data_qos(fc))) {
-               u16 tid, ssn;
-               u8 *qc;
-               sta = sta_info_get(local, hdr->addr1);
-               if (sta) {
                        qc = ieee80211_get_qos_ctl(hdr);
                        tid = qc[0] & 0xf;
                        ssn = ((le16_to_cpu(hdr->seq_ctrl) + 0x10)
@@ -576,17 +574,19 @@ void ieee80211_tx_status(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct sk_buff *skb)
                        ieee80211_send_bar(sta->sdata, hdr->addr1,
                                           tid, ssn);
                }
-       }
 
-       if (info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_STAT_TX_FILTERED) {
-               sta = sta_info_get(local, hdr->addr1);
-               if (sta) {
+               if (info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_STAT_TX_FILTERED) {
                        ieee80211_handle_filtered_frame(local, sta, skb);
                        rcu_read_unlock();
                        return;
+               } else {
+                       if (info->status.excessive_retries)
+                               sta->tx_retry_failed++;
+                       sta->tx_retry_count += info->status.retry_count;
                }
-       } else
+
                rate_control_tx_status(local->mdev, skb);
+       }
 
        rcu_read_unlock();
 
index 21e1942ea9759e42ecd6c15600770b4a562e182d..94867860c3e0de09a15f342437bd0580e55330cb 100644 (file)
@@ -282,17 +282,6 @@ static void rate_control_pid_tx_status(void *priv, struct net_device *dev,
                spinfo->tx_num_xmit++;
        }
 
-       if (info->status.excessive_retries) {
-               sta->tx_retry_failed++;
-               sta->tx_num_consecutive_failures++;
-               sta->tx_num_mpdu_fail++;
-       } else {
-               sta->tx_num_consecutive_failures = 0;
-               sta->tx_num_mpdu_ok++;
-       }
-       sta->tx_retry_count += info->status.retry_count;
-       sta->tx_num_mpdu_fail += info->status.retry_count;
-
        /* Update PID controller state. */
        period = (HZ * pinfo->sampling_period + 500) / 1000;
        if (!period)
index e7ce12dbf2701881e21ccb63d32e334cefffe92e..4a9b96eeb6875eb689bd7211c2055ba86cb72007 100644 (file)
@@ -195,9 +195,6 @@ struct sta_ampdu_mlme {
  * @tx_filtered_count: TBD
  * @tx_retry_failed: TBD
  * @tx_retry_count: TBD
- * @tx_num_consecutive_failures: TBD
- * @tx_num_mpdu_ok: TBD
- * @tx_num_mpdu_fail: TBD
  * @fail_avg: moving percentage of failed MSDUs
  * @tx_packets: number of RX/TX MSDUs
  * @tx_bytes: TBD
@@ -273,10 +270,6 @@ struct sta_info {
        /* Updated from TX status path only, no locking requirements */
        unsigned long tx_filtered_count;
        unsigned long tx_retry_failed, tx_retry_count;
-       /* TODO: update in generic code not rate control? */
-       u32 tx_num_consecutive_failures;
-       u32 tx_num_mpdu_ok;
-       u32 tx_num_mpdu_fail;
        /* moving percentage of failed MSDUs */
        unsigned int fail_avg;