From 8de0b8a7eaf274d197698b035090eeb805f62de6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Glauber Costa Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:10:13 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] x86: use user_mode_vm instead of user_mode For x86_64, it does not really matter. But makes the code equal to i386. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/kernel/time_64.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/time_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/time_64.c index 7fd995edb76..0469243ae1b 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/time_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/time_64.c @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs *regs) /* Assume the lock function has either no stack frame or a copy of flags from PUSHF Eflags always has bits 22 and up cleared unlike kernel addresses. */ - if (!user_mode(regs) && in_lock_functions(pc)) { + if (!user_mode_vm(regs) && in_lock_functions(pc)) { #ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER return *(unsigned long *)(regs->bp + sizeof(long)); #else -- 2.41.0