From 277d1f5846d84e16760131a93b7a67ebfa8eded4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Suresh Siddha Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:11:55 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] x2apic: uninline uv_init_apic_ldr() Andrew says: > There's no point in declaring it inline if it's always called indirectly. And point taken! Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/kernel/genx2apic_uv_x.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/genx2apic_uv_x.c b/arch/x86/kernel/genx2apic_uv_x.c index dcd4fb219da..c915f750241 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/genx2apic_uv_x.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/genx2apic_uv_x.c @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static int uv_apic_id_registered(void) return 1; } -static inline void uv_init_apic_ldr(void) +static void uv_init_apic_ldr(void) { } -- 2.41.1