From a170fc43065439cff6d18f02a1571a92718b9623 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Roel Kluin Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:43:40 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2: possible division by 0 In linus' git tree the functions can be found at: vi arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-tusb6010.c +200 - tusb6010_platform_retime() vi arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c +94 - gpmc_get_fclk_period() vi arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-tusb6010.c +53 - tusb_set_async_mode() vi arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-tusb6010.c +111 - tusb_set_sync_mode() is -ENODEV appropriate when sysclk_ps == 0? This was found by code analysis, please review. ------------------------------>8-------------8<--------------------------------- gpmc_get_fclk_period() may return 0 when gpmc_l3_clk is not enabled. This is not checked in tusb6010_platform_retime() nor in tusb_set_async_mode() it seems. In tusb_set_sync_mode() this may result in a division by zero. Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-tusb6010.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-tusb6010.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-tusb6010.c index 32b7c8595bb..59c1d57e507 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-tusb6010.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-tusb6010.c @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ int tusb6010_platform_retime(unsigned is_refclk) unsigned sysclk_ps; int status; - if (!refclk_psec) + if (!refclk_psec || sysclk_ps == 0) return -ENODEV; sysclk_ps = is_refclk ? refclk_psec : TUSB6010_OSCCLK_60; -- 2.41.0