From: Adrian Hunter Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:48:39 +0000 (+0300) Subject: UBIFS: fix typos in comments X-Git-Tag: v2.6.27-rc4~65^2~14 X-Git-Url: http://www.pilppa.org/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7d62ff2c396470bb62a3853f14d3962eac1da974;p=linux-2.6-omap-h63xx.git UBIFS: fix typos in comments Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter --- diff --git a/fs/ubifs/journal.c b/fs/ubifs/journal.c index 0bcee7d221e..25de6fde383 100644 --- a/fs/ubifs/journal.c +++ b/fs/ubifs/journal.c @@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ out_free: } /** - * ubifs_jnl_write_inode - delete an inode. + * ubifs_jnl_delete_inode - delete an inode. * @c: UBIFS file-system description object * @inode: inode to delete * @@ -831,21 +831,21 @@ out_free: * journal. * * When regular file inodes are unlinked or a directory inode is removed, the - * 'ubifs_jnl_update()' function write corresponding deletion inode and + * 'ubifs_jnl_update()' function writes a corresponding deletion inode and * direntry to the media, and adds the inode to orphans. After this, when the * last reference to this inode has been dropped, this function is called. In * general, it has to write one more deletion inode to the media, because if * a commit happened between 'ubifs_jnl_update()' and * 'ubifs_jnl_delete_inode()', the deletion inode is not in the journal - * anymore, and in fact it might be not on the flash anymore, becouse it might - * have been garbage-collected already. And for optimization reasond UBIFS does + * anymore, and in fact it might not be on the flash anymore, because it might + * have been garbage-collected already. And for optimization reasons UBIFS does * not read the orphan area if it has been unmounted cleanly, so it would have * no indication in the journal that there is a deleted inode which has to be * removed from TNC. * * However, if there was no commit between 'ubifs_jnl_update()' and * 'ubifs_jnl_delete_inode()', then there is no need to write the deletion - * inode to the media for the second time. And this is quite typical case. + * inode to the media for the second time. And this is quite a typical case. * * This function returns zero in case of success and a negative error code in * case of failure.