While ideally CLONE_NEWUSER will eventually require no
privilege, the required permission checks are currently
not there.  As a result, CLONE_NEWUSER has the same effect
as a setuid(0)+setgroups(1,"0").  While we already require
CAP_SYS_ADMIN, requiring CAP_SETUID and CAP_SETGID seems
appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
                /* hopefully this check will go away when userns support is
                 * complete
                 */
-               if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+               if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) || !capable(CAP_SETUID) ||
+                               !capable(CAP_SETGID))
                        return -EPERM;
        }