]> www.pilppa.org Git - linux-2.6-omap-h63xx.git/commitdiff
[PATCH] slab: extract slab order calculation to separate function
authorPekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Sun, 8 Jan 2006 09:00:36 +0000 (01:00 -0800)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org>
Mon, 9 Jan 2006 04:12:39 +0000 (20:12 -0800)
This patch moves the ugly loop that determines the 'optimal' size (page order)
of cache slabs from kmem_cache_create() to a separate function and cleans it
up a bit.

Thanks to Matthew Wilcox for the help with this patch.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
mm/slab.c

index 3d3b5a46854f5dcfef4bf8a920c81c1101d05ac8..2551b1eeadb3d5a9f960287c7d6e5b35abb0cbc8 100644 (file)
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -1473,6 +1473,53 @@ static inline void set_up_list3s(kmem_cache_t *cachep, int index)
        }
 }
 
+/**
+ * calculate_slab_order - calculate size (page order) of slabs and the number
+ *                        of objects per slab.
+ *
+ * This could be made much more intelligent.  For now, try to avoid using
+ * high order pages for slabs.  When the gfp() functions are more friendly
+ * towards high-order requests, this should be changed.
+ */
+static inline size_t calculate_slab_order(kmem_cache_t *cachep, size_t size,
+                                         size_t align, gfp_t flags)
+{
+       size_t left_over = 0;
+
+       for ( ; ; cachep->gfporder++) {
+               unsigned int num;
+               size_t remainder;
+
+               if (cachep->gfporder > MAX_GFP_ORDER) {
+                       cachep->num = 0;
+                       break;
+               }
+
+               cache_estimate(cachep->gfporder, size, align, flags,
+                              &remainder, &num);
+               if (!num)
+                       continue;
+               /* More than offslab_limit objects will cause problems */
+               if (flags & CFLGS_OFF_SLAB && cachep->num > offslab_limit)
+                       break;
+
+               cachep->num = num;
+               left_over = remainder;
+
+               /*
+                * Large number of objects is good, but very large slabs are
+                * currently bad for the gfp()s.
+                */
+               if (cachep->gfporder >= slab_break_gfp_order)
+                       break;
+
+               if ((left_over * 8) <= (PAGE_SIZE << cachep->gfporder))
+                       /* Acceptable internal fragmentation */
+                       break;
+       }
+       return left_over;
+}
+
 /**
  * kmem_cache_create - Create a cache.
  * @name: A string which is used in /proc/slabinfo to identify this cache.
@@ -1682,46 +1729,8 @@ kmem_cache_create (const char *name, size_t size, size_t align,
                cachep->gfporder = 0;
                cache_estimate(cachep->gfporder, size, align, flags,
                                        &left_over, &cachep->num);
-       } else {
-               /*
-                * Calculate size (in pages) of slabs, and the num of objs per
-                * slab.  This could be made much more intelligent.  For now,
-                * try to avoid using high page-orders for slabs.  When the
-                * gfp() funcs are more friendly towards high-order requests,
-                * this should be changed.
-                */
-               do {
-                       unsigned int break_flag = 0;
-cal_wastage:
-                       cache_estimate(cachep->gfporder, size, align, flags,
-                                               &left_over, &cachep->num);
-                       if (break_flag)
-                               break;
-                       if (cachep->gfporder >= MAX_GFP_ORDER)
-                               break;
-                       if (!cachep->num)
-                               goto next;
-                       if (flags & CFLGS_OFF_SLAB &&
-                                       cachep->num > offslab_limit) {
-                               /* This num of objs will cause problems. */
-                               cachep->gfporder--;
-                               break_flag++;
-                               goto cal_wastage;
-                       }
-
-                       /*
-                        * Large num of objs is good, but v. large slabs are
-                        * currently bad for the gfp()s.
-                        */
-                       if (cachep->gfporder >= slab_break_gfp_order)
-                               break;
-
-                       if ((left_over*8) <= (PAGE_SIZE<<cachep->gfporder))
-                               break;  /* Acceptable internal fragmentation. */
-next:
-                       cachep->gfporder++;
-               } while (1);
-       }
+       } else
+               left_over = calculate_slab_order(cachep, size, align, flags);
 
        if (!cachep->num) {
                printk("kmem_cache_create: couldn't create cache %s.\n", name);