Steven Rostedt suggested:
| Wouldn't it look nicer to have: (TRACEPOINT_TABLE_SIZE - 1) ?
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
struct tracepoint_entry *e;
u32 hash = jhash(name, strlen(name), 0);
struct tracepoint_entry *e;
u32 hash = jhash(name, strlen(name), 0);
- head = &tracepoint_table[hash & ((1 << TRACEPOINT_HASH_BITS)-1)];
+ head = &tracepoint_table[hash & (TRACEPOINT_TABLE_SIZE - 1)];
hlist_for_each_entry(e, node, head, hlist) {
if (!strcmp(name, e->name))
return e;
hlist_for_each_entry(e, node, head, hlist) {
if (!strcmp(name, e->name))
return e;
size_t name_len = strlen(name) + 1;
u32 hash = jhash(name, name_len-1, 0);
size_t name_len = strlen(name) + 1;
u32 hash = jhash(name, name_len-1, 0);
- head = &tracepoint_table[hash & ((1 << TRACEPOINT_HASH_BITS)-1)];
+ head = &tracepoint_table[hash & (TRACEPOINT_TABLE_SIZE - 1)];
hlist_for_each_entry(e, node, head, hlist) {
if (!strcmp(name, e->name)) {
printk(KERN_NOTICE
hlist_for_each_entry(e, node, head, hlist) {
if (!strcmp(name, e->name)) {
printk(KERN_NOTICE
size_t len = strlen(name) + 1;
u32 hash = jhash(name, len-1, 0);
size_t len = strlen(name) + 1;
u32 hash = jhash(name, len-1, 0);
- head = &tracepoint_table[hash & ((1 << TRACEPOINT_HASH_BITS)-1)];
+ head = &tracepoint_table[hash & (TRACEPOINT_TABLE_SIZE - 1)];
hlist_for_each_entry(e, node, head, hlist) {
if (!strcmp(name, e->name)) {
found = 1;
hlist_for_each_entry(e, node, head, hlist) {
if (!strcmp(name, e->name)) {
found = 1;